<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patrick Vuong &#124; word mercenary: the keyboard, his rifle. the alphabet, his ammo. &#187; Avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patrickvuong.com/archives/tag/avatar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patrickvuong.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Hurt Locker Explodes With Oscar Win</title>
		<link>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1139</link>
		<comments>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1139#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screenwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenplays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Big]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Boal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickvuong.com/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker wins the Best Original Screenplay Oscar, along with Best Picture, Best Director and three other naked statuettes. Wow. I&#8217;m both thrilled for the filmmakers and kinda stunned at the same time. I love the fact that this &#8220;little movie that could&#8221; has, in fact, &#8220;did.&#8221; But is it really better than other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UBpRdmCp6Io&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x402061&#038;color2=0x9461ca&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UBpRdmCp6Io&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x402061&#038;color2=0x9461ca&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object><br />
</center><br />
<P><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/" target="_blank">The Hurt Locker</a> </em></strong>wins the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70NyOMS1HPU" target="_blank"><strong>Best Original Screenplay Oscar</strong></a>, along with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBpRdmCp6Io" target="_blank"><strong>Best Picture</strong>, <strong>Best Director</strong> and three other naked statuettes</a>.</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m both thrilled for the filmmakers and kinda stunned at the same time. I love the fact that this &#8220;little movie that could&#8221; has, in fact, &#8220;did.&#8221; But is it really better than other great nominees out there?</p>
<p>From a screenwriting point of view, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1676793/" target="_blank">Mark Boal</a>&#8216;s script is an extremely taunt dramatic thriller, a fresh take on an established subgenre of war movies. It has extremely real characters, fantastic dialogue, and a real sense of immediacy. (It helps that Mark drew from his experiences as a journalist embedded with a real Iraq War bomb squad unit.) But, <a href="http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1125">as I wrote previously</a>, I was left wanting a stronger character arc (as the hero doesn&#8217;t learn anything by the end of the flick) and a bigger conflict.</p>
<p>From a directing stand point, I&#8217;m thrilled for <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000941/" target="_blank">Kathryn Bigelow</a>, the <strong>first woman director to win the Oscar</strong>. She&#8217;s been around a while and is extremely talented. She pulled the strings at just the right moments to up the tension then pulled back . But is her work a bigger accomplishment than what he ex-husband James Cameron did with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a>, a gargantuan movie that not only destroyed the box office but has redefined the very essence of 3-D movies and what can be done mixing live action, performance caption, and CGI? No doubt <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar </em></a>was a logistical nightmare from which he draw an amazingly thriller crowd-pleaser.</p>
<p>But should anyone really be that surprised the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em> </a>didn&#8217;t win any of the major awards? It is, after all, just an &#8220;sci-fi&#8221; flick, a genre that is looked down upon by the Academy. No genre film has ever won Best Picture.</p>
<p>Ultimately, though, any time a small indie like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/" target="_blank"><em>The Hurt Locker</em></a> wins, it&#8217;s a good thing for filmmakers and screenwriters like me, guys on the out edges of Hollywood trying to bust into the inner circle.</p>
<p>Congrats, Mark and Kathryn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1139/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar Continues Box-Office Beatdown</title>
		<link>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1054</link>
		<comments>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1054#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickvuong.com/?p=1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avatar continues to whup massive box-office ass (as reported by Entertainment Weekly). And rightfully so (see my review). Here&#8217;s a snippet of EW&#8217;s assessment: A trio of new releases failed to topple James Cameron’s Avatar, which claimed the top spot at the box office for the fourth weekend in a row. The 3-D epic earned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a> continues to <a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/01/09/box-office-avatar/" target="_blank">whup massive box-office ass</a> (as reported by <a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/01/09/box-office-avatar/" target="_blank"><em>Entertainment Weekly</em></a>). And rightfully so (see <a href="http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1015" target="_blank">my review</a>). Here&#8217;s a snippet of EW&#8217;s assessment:</p>
<blockquote><p>A trio of new releases failed to topple James Cameron’s <a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20326743,00.html" target="_self"><em>Avatar</em></a>, which claimed the top spot at the box office for the fourth weekend in a row. The 3-D epic earned $13.3 million on Friday, bringing its domestic total to a staggering $393.8 million, <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2010-01-08&amp;p=.htm" target="_blank">according to early estimates</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Finally, a smash hit that I can actually support and that doesn&#8217;t feature <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/twilight-sucks" target="_blank">poorly-written vampires</a> who glisten like diamonds in sunlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1054/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Produced Screenplays of 2009</title>
		<link>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1027</link>
		<comments>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1027#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adaptations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screenwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenplays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inglourious Basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liam Neeson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luc Besson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Taratino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blind Side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hangover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickvuong.com/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another year, another arbitrary &#8220;Best Of&#8221; list. But this isn&#8217;t just any arbitrary &#8220;Best Of&#8221; list. This is my arbitrary Top 8 list. Why Top 8, why not Top 5 or Top 10? Why not. Plus, I did a Top 4 last year. So, enjoy! It&#8217;s kinda hard to judge a screenplay by watching the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another year, another arbitrary &#8220;Best Of&#8221; list. But this isn&#8217;t just any arbitrary &#8220;Best Of&#8221; list. This is my arbitrary Top 8 list. Why Top 8, why not Top 5 or Top 10? Why not. Plus, I did a <a href="http://patrickvuong.com/archives/566" target="_blank">Top 4 last year</a>. So, enjoy!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kinda hard to judge a screenplay by watching the resultant film without reading the actual screenplay. But I&#8217;ll do my best here to strip away the director&#8217;s gorgeous choices, the actors&#8217; brilliant human touches, and the rest of the crew&#8217;s awesome work, so I can focus on the movie&#8217;s spine: the script. <span style="color: #008000;">(Keep in mind I have <span style="text-decoration: underline;">not</span> yet seen the usual late-in-the-year Oscar bait, such as <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929632/" target="_blank"><em>Precious</em></a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1193138/" target="_blank"><em>Up in the Air</em></a>, or <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0875034/" target="_blank"><em>Nine</em></a>, or highly praised smaller movies, like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/" target="_blank"><em>The Hurt Locker</em></a>.)</span></p>
<p>Below is my list of 2009&#8242;s Best Produced Screenplays:</p>
<p><strong>1. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/" target="_blank"><em>Up</em></a></strong><em><br />
</em><strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0677037/" target="_blank">Bob Peterson</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0230032/" target="_blank">Pete Docter</a></strong><br />
The first three on my list are all running neck and neck and neck for the top spot, but ultimately, I had to give it to <em>Up</em>, this funny, emotional, unpredictable, and technically brilliant animated film from (where else?) Pixar Studios. It has everything a near-perfect screenplay should have: real (and really flawed) characters, realistic (yet witty) dialogue, strong (and strongly motivated) villains, and a believable character arc (there&#8217;s two actually, one for each of the main characters). Who knew a cartoon about a senior citizen and a chubby kid in a balloon-powered floating house would be so riveting?</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/" target="_blank"><em><strong>District 9</strong></em></a><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0088955/" target="_blank">Neill Blomkamp</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2833612/" target="_blank">Terri Tatchell</a></strong><br />
&#8220;Wow.&#8221; That was my first impression after seeing this movie. Smart on so many levels and wholly different from anything Hollywood could ever hope to produce, <em>District 9</em> is a ticking time-bomb of a story: it starts off like a real-life documentary about alien refugees, sprints off like an action movie on fire, and ends with one cataclysmic sci-fi bang that leaves you blown away.</p>
<p><strong>3. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a></strong><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000116/" target="_blank">James Cameron</a></strong><br />
James Cameron&#8217;s screenplay for this year&#8217;s most anticipated film and history&#8217;s most expensive movie ever is by no means subtle. But it does exactly what a good script should do: act as the solid blueprint for an amazingly sound yet beautiful cinematic monolith to be built upon. From paying off small first-act setups to putting a 22nd-Century twist on cliched elements, the <em>Avatar </em>story is breathtaking, intense, and otherworldly &#8212; it reminds us of the very reasons we go to the cinema in the first place.</p>
<p><strong>4. </strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/" target="_blank"><em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em></a><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0649460/" target="_blank">Roberto Orci</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0476064/" target="_blank">Alex Kurtzman</a></strong><br />
Director J.J. Abrams is a pop-culture God. Just look at his <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0009190/" target="_blank">recent credits</a>. And his re-imagining of the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_The_Original_Series" target="_blank"> original <em>Star Trek </em>series</a> was a pretty damn good balance between appeasing the Trekkers and Trekkies (depending on your level of geekdom) and telling a suspenseful, witty, and action-packed sci-fi opera for the newbies. But it&#8217;s really the screenwriting duo of Orci &amp; Kurtzman who should share in the glory. Though their screenplay has a few flaws (<strong>[spoiler until the end of the parenthesis]</strong> why the Hell does Kirk go from ensign to captain of the Enterprise in less than a day???), its solid structure is what allowed Abrams to pull off the sacrilegious move of remaking a classic.</p>
<p><strong>5. </strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361748/" target="_blank"><em><strong>Inglourious Basterds </strong></em></a><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/" target="_blank">Quentin Tarantino</a></strong><br />
This historical fantasy made a big splash because it was Quentin Tarantino&#8217;s return to form, his entree back into pop-culture consciousness after the dismal performance of his half of <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462322/" target="_blank">Grindhouse</a></em>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1028528/" target="_blank"><em>Death Proof</em></a>. Unique anti-heroes (a band of covert U.S. Army Jews infiltrating Nazi-occupied France), long-winded monologues, and the most delicious villain we&#8217;ve seen in a long time. Sure some of his scenes needed to be trimmed (the pub scene was way too long!) and the alternate-history ending didn&#8217;t sit well with me, but overall, <em>Inglourious Basterds</em> was one of the most unique screenplays of the year and one of the most enjoyable movies.</p>
<p><strong>6. </strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0936501/" target="_blank"><em><strong>Taken </strong></em></a><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000108/" target="_blank">Luc Besson</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0436543/" target="_blank">Robert Mark Kamen</a></strong><br />
A stellar example of how a script with a simple premise -– Liam Neeson plays an ex-CIA agent who must find his daughter&#8217;s kidnappers in France -— can result in a tight, suspenseful thriller so long as the execution is done right.</p>
<p><strong>7. </strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1119646/" target="_blank"><em><strong>The Hangover </strong></em></a><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0524190/" target="_blank">Jon Lucas</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601859/" target="_blank">Scott Moore</a> </strong><br />
There was no single funnier movie in 2009 than <em>The Hangover</em>. Lucas and Moore take the tired “bachelor party in Vegas” subgenre, put a subtle <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/" target="_blank"><em>Memento</em></a>-like slant on it, and deliver one of the most jaw-droppingly, surprisingly hilarious films of the year.</p>
<p><strong>8. </strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0878804/" target="_blank"><em><strong>The Blind Side </strong></em></a><br />
<strong>Written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0359387/" target="_blank">John Lee Hancock</a></strong><br />
I usually don&#8217;t fall for the based-on-a-true-story, tear-jerking, feel-good dramas, but this Sandra Bullock-starring football movie took me by surprise. Why? Because the screenplay had well-rounded characters and a simple but effective plotline &#8212; all causing you to empathize with the main character. An effective family-friendly drama if ever there were one this year.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mentions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1179904/" target="_blank"><em>Paranormal Activity</em></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1155056/" target="_blank"><em>I Love You, Man</em></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/" target="_blank"><em>Watchmen</em></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0963178/" target="_blank"><em>The International</em></a></li>
</ul>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 903px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1027/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar: It Ain&#8217;t Just All Flash</title>
		<link>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1015</link>
		<comments>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1015#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screenwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Na'vi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pandora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Worthington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickvuong.com/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t already, treat yourself to a holiday present and watch Avatar. Is it the best movie ever made based on the best screenplay ever written? No, of course not. But it&#8217;s certainly one of the better movies I&#8217;ve seen in a long, long time. Though it&#8217;s wrapped in the most mind-blowing special-effects package, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><br />
<object width="500" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5PSNL1qE6VY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x006699&#038;color2=0x54abd6&#038;<br />
border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5PSNL1qE6VY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x006699&#038;color2=0x54abd6&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="315"></embed></object><br />
</center><br />
<P><br />
If you haven&#8217;t already, treat yourself to a holiday present and watch <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a>.</p>
<p>Is it the best movie ever made based on the best screenplay ever written? No, of course not. But it&#8217;s certainly one of the better movies I&#8217;ve seen in a long, long time. Though it&#8217;s wrapped in the most mind-blowing special-effects package, the true gift inside is the no-gimmicks heart-felt action-packed story &#8212; it&#8217;ll satisfy your mind and heart long after you toss the goofy-looking 3D glasses that the box-office attendant hands you before you enter the theater.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve been living under a rock lately or swamped with holiday shopping, here&#8217;s a rundown: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a><em> </em>is set in the far future when humans have consumed Earth and is looking to extract minerals from the planet of Pandora for fuel. But aliens called Na&#8217;vi live there and refuse to make way for bulldozers. Enter Jake Sully, a paraplegic ex-Marine (played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0941777/" target="_blank">Sam Worthington</a>) who volunteers to control a Na&#8217;vi-human hybrid to inflitrate and influence the natives. One problem: Jake realizes he&#8217;s playing for the wrong team when he falls in love with a Na&#8217;vi princess.</p>
<p>Writer-director<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000116/" target="_blank"> James Cameron</a> has been working on this movie for 12 years, and his hard work and persistence pays off plenty of dividends. His script combines so many great elements (action, sci-fi, romance, politics, and history) in one unified, poetic tale.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not Cameron&#8217;s most subtle script (the aliens in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a><em> </em>are clearly a parallel to Native Americans), but it&#8217;s certainly his most ambitious. Twelve years and $300 million later, he still doesn&#8217;t let that all that overshadow the action-packed love story.</p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;m a little biased, as Cameron is probably my favorite writer-director out of the myriad of filmmakers I admire. Aside from also being a Canadian-born Southern Californian like me, Cameron is one of the rare auteurs who can handle both visuals and story, action and drama.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s never made a bad movie. (OK, I&#8217;ve never seen his first one, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082910/" target="_blank"><em>Piranha Part Two</em></a>, but I&#8217;m certain if I did watch it, I&#8217;ll think it&#8217;s the greatest B-movie ever.) From the original <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/" target="_blank">The Terminator</a> </em>to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/" target="_blank"><em>Aliens</em></a> to <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/" target="_blank">Terminator 2: Judgment Day</a> </em>to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120338/" target="_blank"><em>Titanic</em></a>, every one of Cameron&#8217;s movies are epic entertainment.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because he understands how to use intense action to further a compelling story, rather than the other way around.</p>
<p>So sprinkle a little holiday cheer on yourself and watch <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/" target="_blank"><em>Avatar</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patrickvuong.com/archives/1015/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
